Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A good., & Rumiati, R. We. (2021). The fresh new contribution out of identification and you may cleverness into cognitive competences inside higher training. Frontiers when you look at the Mindset, several, 2566.

Damian, R. I., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, A beneficial., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of identity balances and change round the 50 years. Record out of Character and you can Public Psychology, 117(3), 674.

Daurio, Good. M., & Taylor, J. (2022). An investigation of triarchic model of psychopathy and you will notice-claimed Group B personality sickness attributes. Character Issues: Theory, Look, and Treatment, 13(2), 153.

Furnham, An effective., & Monsen, J. (2009). Character traits and cleverness expect instructional school levels. Understanding and you will personal differences, 19(1), 28-33.

Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Forecasting educational and you will societal–psychological effects when you look at the emerging adulthood from cleverness, character, and you may socioeconomic position. Diary off Identity and you can Personal Psychology.

The netherlands, A great. S., & Roisman, Grams. I. (2008). Huge Five personality traits and you will dating quality: Self-claimed, observational, and physiological research. Record out-of Societal and personal Relationships, 25(5), 811-829.

Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Meters. (2006). The partnership between intelligence and divorce. Journal away from Household members Activities, 27(12), 1723-1748.

Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y AzerbaГЇdjanais femmes Г  la recherche de maris. (2006). Symptomatology away from People-B Identification Issues from the Four-Basis Design Direction. Chinese Psychological state Journal.

Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). School education and non-cognitive skills innovation. Oxford Economic Records, 70(2), 538-562.

Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The fresh feeling regarding parents’ and you will spouses’ degree into the splitting up rates when you look at the Norway. Demographic look, 10, 121-142.

Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. M., Haugen, P. Yards., & Grain, H. B. (1985). Critiques of actual attractiveness just like the a function of decades. The fresh new Log of Public Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.

Spouse well worth can get decline (or perhaps not), although it does perhaps not be seemingly a shield so you can relationships creation

McGue, Yards., Anderson, E. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, A., Iacono, W. G., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Not of the grams alone: The key benefits of a degree certainly one of people with low levels of general intellectual function. Cleverness, ninety five, 101642.

Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, Meters. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Try sociable somebody way more beautiful? A zero-associate studies regarding agreeableness, extraversion, and you may elegance. Log away from Look inside the Character, 44(2), 293-296.

Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The brand new communications between college impoverishment and you may agreeableness when you look at the anticipating informative attainment. Identification and Individual Differences, 127, 85-88.

Standard traits of identity and you may affectivity given that predictors of satisfaction from inside the close relationship: Research from care about?and you can mate?product reviews

Tatarunaite, E., Playle, Roentgen., Bonnet, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Face attractiveness: good longitudinal analysis. American Log regarding Orthodontics and you will Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.

Sarah Ton, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and you may Michael Westberry. Provided Societal Explore Microdata Series, Most recent People Questionnaire: Type 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.

Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, E. S., & ). Aspects of breakup and you will recollections out-of premarital input: Implications to own improving matchmaking training. Couple and you will Friends Therapy: Research and exercise, 2(2), 131.

Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Why do character traits anticipate divorce case? Several pathways owing to satisfaction. Log regarding Identification and you will Societal Psychology, 106(6), 978.

Vernon, P. An excellent., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. An excellent. (2008). A behavioural hereditary investigation of one’s Black Triad additionally the Huge 5. Identity and you may individual Distinctions, 44(2), 445-452.

Widiger, T. A beneficial., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, Yards., Clark, L. An effective., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, Roentgen., … & Wright, A beneficial. Grams. (2019). Personality in good hierarchical make of psychopathology. Logical Mental Research, 7(1), 77-92.

The modern CPS studies usually do not show in case the risk of separation try ingredient. Interactions you are going to imply mixed marriages keeps high or all the way down risks than the sum total risks of several anybody. Although not, prior research into separation and divorce and you can knowledge demonstrates that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The fresh breakup chance for a couple of PhD holders means fifteen%, similar to the personal likelihood of eight-8% to possess personal PhD proprietors.

Buss, D. Yards., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Ray, D. (2017). The fresh new companion modifying hypothesis. Character and you may Personal Distinctions, 104, 143-149.